Maximising the Inflation Reduction Act: four things to watch
The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) has transformed the US from laggard to leader in energy transition policy – but greater clarity in some areas will be essential to prospective investors
4 minute read
David Brown
Director, Energy Transition Practice
David Brown
Director, Energy Transition Practice
David is a key author of our Energy Transition Outlook and Accelerated Energy Transition Scenarios.
Latest articles by David
-
Opinion
Energy transition outlook: Americas
-
The Edge
Nuclear’s massive net zero growth opportunity
-
The Edge
COP28 key takeaways
-
The Edge
How the world gets onto a 1.5 °C pathway
-
Opinion
Energy transition in the Americas: three key questions
-
Opinion
How Colombia could lead Latin America through the energy transition
The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) is an energy transition policy game-changer for the US. But now the initial furore has died down the next phase – leveraging the IRA to realise President Biden’s net zero vision – must ramp up.
It’s a mammoth undertaking. Our analysis of a net zero outcome for the US requires US$10 trillion in investment through 2050. And additional guidance from the Biden administration is needed to see the IRA truly jump-start that investment.
So, what are the key steps that could optimise the huge potential of this landmark policy change? Where is greater clarity needed to create optimal conditions for investors?
Our new report explores four key technology areas to watch:
- Carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) permitting processes
- Low carbon hydrogen exports’ eligibility for 45v tax credits
- The role of renewable energy credits (RECs) and time-matching for green hydrogen
- Battery raw materials
Fill in the form to read an extract of the report – and read on for an introduction.
1. CCUS permitting: all eyes on EPA processes
Permitting is a key issue that will influence CCUS development in the US in 2023. While the IRA has improved incentives, CCUS FIDs are not in the bag. The uncertainty associated with permitting rests with whether or not the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) process to license Class VI wells (for CO2 sequestration) will accelerate, or how fast the federal EPA will grant primacy over Class VI wells to individual states.
Primacy is extremely important to CCUS developers. In theory, it would grant states the ability to permit CCUS storage wells at a faster speed than the federal government. Texas and Louisiana are targeting one- to two-year approvals for Class VI storage wells, faster than the last Class VI well which was permitted over a six-year process.
And the time to act is now: our base case forecast expects that CCUS capacity in the US expands from current operational capacity of around 25 Mt to around 85 Mt by 2030. Over that timeline, we expect carbon capture capacity to target wider applications of dedicated sequestration sourced from a variety of industries including ethanol, LNG, and blue hydrogen.
For more on how the EPA might evaluate primacy applications, the impact on CCUS investors – and the silver lining amid the cloud of confusion – fill in the form to read this report in full.
2. Low carbon hydrogen exports: 45V eligibility clarity needed
The IRA reintroduces a production tax credit (PTC) for clean hydrogen, known as the 45V. Are low carbon hydrogen export projects eligible for the 45V incentive? The IRA does not say yes – or no. We believe that this issue must be clarified for low carbon hydrogen export projects to advance.
In principle, the US$3/kg 45V incentive could help make the US a leader in low carbon hydrogen exports. Low carbon hydrogen feedstock will be some of the lowest cost in the world due to:
- production and investment tax credits for wind and solar
- natural gas prices that peak at US$5.50/mmbtu in 2050
- expanded 45Q tax credits for CCUS.
Read the full report for more of our view of the export opportunity under different scenarios – and why timing is crucial as global trade in low-carbon hydrogen hots up.
3. Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) and time-matching rules to be defined
One of the largest areas of uncertainty within the IRA is how green hydrogen producers will certify that their power supply is zero emissions. The type of power used to produce hydrogen will have a large influence on lifecycle emissions – a key component of calculating the level of policy support.
But power output in the US is not 100% carbon-free. As of end 2022, around 60% is from fossil fuel generation. The IRS needs to clarify whether or not RECs can be used towards qualifying for the 45V and establish time-matching standards for power procurement.
How might the REC market evolve as green hydrogen expands? Read the full report to find out more.
4. Automakers seek looser eligibility requirements
The IRA is a strong tailwind for decarbonised transport. However, fulfilling some of the incentive requirements may be difficult. Automakers are currently seeking clarification from the IRS on a range of issues – and a key area of focus is battery raw material supply chains.
The IRA established a US$7,500 incentive for battery electric vehicle (BEV) sales, up to a vehicle value of US$55,000. 50% of this incentive requires a proportion of battery components to be manufactured or assembled in North America.
But China has more than an 80% market share for battery components, including cathodes, anodes, current collectors, solvents, additives and electrolyte salts. Battery manufacturing from China and other ‘foreign entities of concern’ (FEOC) are excluded from IRA’s incentive rules.