;
Opinion

Can Australia create energy super basins?

How can Australia transition from traditional upstream to advantaged energy super basins, and why is action needed?

Anne Forbes

Senior Research Analyst, Upstream

Anne focuses on upstream assets updates at the intersection of our upstream and geology research

Latest articles by Anne

View Anne Forbes's full profile

The world’s need for sustainable energy requires the upstream industry to utilise and deliver renewables and carbon capture storage (CCS) at scale. To do that we must focus on where the synergies with low-carbon technologies are greatest. 

We define these as the energy super basins of the future, where large hydrocarbon resources are co-located with plentiful clean electricity and CCS potential. This insight examines why these energy basins are key to how upstream survives and maintains its license to operate in Australia. 

Fill in the form to download a complimentary extract from this presentation from APPEA 2023 conference and read on for an introduction.  

The energy basin concept 

The oil and gas industry has long prioritised resilience and sustainability was often an afterthought.  

Energy basins combine upstream hydrocarbons with clean electricity and CCS. They provide a viable pathway for the oil and gas industry to become sustainable and resilient. Basins without these attributes are disadvantaged, and face being left behind. The chart below illustrates the move from traditional upstream basins to energy super basins which now incorporate more than just abundant oil and gas supply. 

Advantage also depends on cost. Renewable energy must be abundant and affordable. In Australia today, upstream resources are plentiful but advantaged resources are not. But that perspective is not fixed, and there is much industry can do to strengthen its outlook. 

How to judge an Australian super basin? 

Using Wood Mackenzie data from Lens, we have ranked Australian basins on factors that will contribute to their future resilience: from cost to clean electricity, from CCS to CO2. Criteria for ranking basins includes factors such as weighted average reservoir CO2, solar and wind generation potential and production cost to name a few. Download the slides to find out how Australia’s basins rank according to our data.  

Why Australia needs to act 

The average upstream emissions intensity of Australian projects is significantly above the global average, due to remote locations, high energy intensity and contaminants. Using renewables and CCS to cut emissions is a logical step. Government policy, new technologies and exploration can also make a difference. 

Australia needs to invest much more in reducing emissions to remain competitive in a fast-changing world and has committed to cutting Scope 1 emissions 43% by 2030 and net zero by 2050. 

Making Australia’s upstream sector resilient and sustainable is a huge challenge and will require ambitious, collaborative, and innovative basin-level thinking.  

Complete the form at the top of the page to download the full research slide deck, including:

  • Diagrammatic illustration of the energy super basins concept

  • Data-led ranking of basins across multiple categories to create ‘resilience’ scores

  • Data from Wood Mackenzie's Emissions Benchmarking tool to paint a picture of the scenario in Australia now, and why the country needs to act

Bespoke packages for independent E&P companies in Australia & Oceania

Find out more about our bespoke Lens packages for independant E&P companies in Australia & Oceania