Refining set for a challenging 2020
IMO and weak demand put margins under pressure
1 minute read
Simon Flowers
Chairman, Chief Analyst and author of The Edge
Simon Flowers
Chairman, Chief Analyst and author of The Edge
Simon is our Chief Analyst; he provides thought leadership on the trends and innovations shaping the energy industry.
Latest articles by Simon
-
The Edge
How and why big oil is strengthening its oil and gas exposure
-
The Edge
Is net zero by 2050 at risk?
-
The Edge
Can emissions taxes decarbonise the LNG industry?
-
The Edge
Why the transition needs smart upstream taxes
-
The Edge
Can carbon offsets deliver for oil and gas companies?
-
Featured
Wood Mackenzie 2023 Research Excellence Awards
Downstream isn’t the glamorous end of the oil business. And in Big Oil, it’s typically dwarfed by upstream. Yet having been forced to restructure and focus on costs early this century, downstream’s cash flow has underpinned a third of the Majors’ shareholder returns over the last five years.
But a laser-like focus on costs and efficiency can only take you so far. If the external environment turns against you, downstream is as vulnerable as any part of the business. The Majors’ downstream results for Q4 2019 were among the poorest since 2015. Petrochemicals is part of that story, with earnings suffering from over-investment.
Now we’re also seeing refining margins come under increasing pressure, slipping to five-year lows in the last few weeks of 2019 and the first of 2020. Alan Gelder, VP Refining, identifies two main factors.
Firstly, new regulation on marine fuels was expected to boost refining margins this year – but that hasn’t played out as expected yet. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations require all vessels to reduce the level of sulphur in their engine emissions from 3.5% to 0.5% or less from 1 January.
New regulation on marine fuels was expected to boost refining margins this year – but that hasn’t played out as expected yet.
Alan Gelder
VP Refining, Chemicals & Oil Markets
Alan is responsible for formulating our research outlook and cross-sector perspectives on the global downstream sector.
Latest articles by Alan
-
Opinion
Assessing the refineries at risk of closure
-
Featured
Oils & chemicals 2024 outlook
-
The Edge
Big Oil’s opportunity for M&A in the petrochemicals downturn
-
Opinion
Survival of the fittest refineries
-
Opinion
Will international shipping be net zero by 2050?
-
Opinion
Are APAC’s retail markets full of Eastern promise for oil majors?
Essentially, IMO should trigger a shift out of low-value product (High Sulphur Fuel Oil, or HSFO) into higher value Very Low Sulphur Fuel Oil (VLSFO). Refinery capacity to make VLSFO is limited, so marine gasoil, which is closely linked to the price of diesel, would top up any shortfall. This shift to high-value products was expected to drive up refining margins in 2020.
It’s only half happened. The price of VLSFO surged in Q4 and HSFO duly collapsed. The surprise was that there’s been much more VLSFO available than expected. Traders had taken advantage of low-price feedstock in late summer 2019 and built up volumes of VLSFO in storage. When the demand came in, they were ready and cashed in, big time. A single tanker loaded with 2 million barrels of VLSFO could make over US$10/bbl on the spread and pull in US$20 million-plus in cash profit.
Producers with the right crude have also fared well. Santos revealed that it had sold a single cargo of heavy sweet crude, ideal feedstock for VLSFO, at an unheard-of US$30/bbl premium to Brent. Nice work if you can get it.
What didn’t really materialise was higher demand for marine gasoil – it’s just not been needed in the volumes anticipated. Weaker marine demand for gasoil has been compounded by soft demand from heating – a much bigger market – because of warm winter weather in the northern hemisphere and lacklustre economic growth. That’s led to a glut of gasoil in inventory which is depressing refining margins.
Second, global oil demand growth forecasts are falling back sharply – potentially a more fundamental problem. The biggest factor is the coronavirus, so we have reduced our demand forecasts in China by almost 0.6 million b/d for Q1 2020. We now expect China demand to fall year-on-year by 125,000 b/d for the quarter, the worst rate since 2009. Global demand will fall by 250,000 b/d, also the worst in over a decade.
So what’s next for refining?
The VLSFO surplus should be a short-term phenomenon. There’s not enough refining capacity to supply all bunker demand with VLSFO. That gap will have to be met by additional gasoil once the surplus VLSFO in inventory is soaked up, by H2 2020 at the latest.
The prospects for oil demand are more worrying and harder to call. At this stage, we have restricted our adjustments to Q1 and left the rest of the year largely unchanged. If the virus can be contained successfully in the coming weeks, demand could bounce back strongly – much as was the case with SARS in 2003.
Refining margins so far in Q1 suggest it will take a while before refining profitability recovers. Meantime, refiners will do what they must to keep costs down and maximise cash flows, including cutting refinery runs to limit the build-up in inventory. It’s about toughing it out, waiting and hoping for demand – China in particular – to perk up again.