Insight
Current prices insufficient to trigger aluminium CAPEX
*Please note that this report only includes an Excel data file if this is indicated in "What's included" below
Report summary
Wood Mackenzie routinely reassesses the long run alumina and aluminium incentive prices, which are the minimum prices needed to make investment in new capacity economically viable. In formulating our view of long run alumina and aluminium prices, we move away from supply-demand-inventory style analysis and use a financial-based model, using discounted cash flow and internal rate of return (IRR) to determine the equilibrium incentive price. In line with conventional economic theory, we assume that in the long run the alumina and aluminium markets are in equilibrium.
Table of contents
- Some refinery costs have become embedded but overall costs declined
- Assumptions used to construct incentive prices
- We employ the following core assumptions:
Tables and charts
This report includes the following images and tables:
-
Alumina prices will have to increase in the future to trigger investment in alumina refinerySome of the increase in refinery energy costs over the years became embeddedCurrent prices insufficient to trigger aluminium CAPEX: Image 5
-
China still carries the lowest capital intensitySmelter capital intensity outside of China, 1980-2020 (US$/t installed capacity)Aluminium prices need to increase to trigger investment but to levels below historical averagesEfficiency and productivity gains meant little embedded costs in aluminium production
What's included
This report contains:
Other reports you may be interested in
Insight
Understanding the recent surge in Chinese thermal coal prices
QHD prices rose by RMB67/t to RMB947/t during the week of 31 August to 4 September.
$1,100
Insight
Heavy rare earths: How stable is China’s monopoly?
China controls refined HREE supply and will stay dominant this decade, but diversification efforts are gaining ground
$1,050
Insight
Copper substitution: Rising incentives, limited disruption
The copper-to-aluminium price ratio has returned to more than 4.2x, a level that historically triggers discussion around substitution.
$1,050
