Insight

Exploration outperformance - sustainable or cyclical?

Loading current market price

Get this report

Loading current market price

Get this report as part of a subscription

Enquire about Subscriptions

Already have subscription? Sign In

Further information

Pay by Invoice or Credit Card FAQs

Contact us

For further information about this report submit the form below.

Report summary

A comparison of our latest ranking of company exploration performance with a similar analysis that we published back in 2005 reveals a remarkable absence of correlation. Today's top explorers, by and large, are not the same as those of a decade earlier. Strong results generally reflect commanding acreage positions in key emerging plays. Such plays may hold a few years' running room, but eventually mature, and the explorer needs to renew its basins of focus. This imparts a fundamental...

What's included

This report contains

  • Document

    Exploration outperformance - sustainable or cyclical?

    PDF 458.50 KB

Table of contents

  • Executive summary
  • Whatever happened to the exploration class of 2005?
  • Sustaining outperformance is hard – how long can top explorers stay ahead?
  • Some reversion to the mean is inevitable for explorers
  • Exploration cyclicity can be balanced with other renewal options
  • Top explorers of the recent past are preparing their comeback

Tables and charts

This report includes 3 images and tables including:

Images

  • Ten year performance ranking by IRR (1995-2004 versus 2003-2012)
  • Cyclical exploration performance model
  • Exploration outperformance - sustainable or cyclical?: Image 3

Questions about this report?

  • Europe:
    +44 131 243 4699
  • Americas:
    +1 713 470 1900
  • Asia Pacific:
    +61 2 8224 8898