Insight
Unravelling US shale's corporate cash flow dilemma
Report summary
Perhaps the primary reason for poor investor sentiment towards Lower 48 corporates is the inability of most operators to consistently generate cash flow from operations in excess of capital expenditures. Cheap and abundant credit, asset sales, and selective use of new equity have financed outspends over the past decade. A detailed analysis of 60 operators central to the development of US shale shows that capital expenditures outpaced cash flow from operations by nearly 25% for the decade. Investors have grown skeptical as operators have raised $54 billion more capital than it has returned to investors. With investor demands for better cash flow discipline and free cash flow yields that are more competitive with other sectors, Lower 48 operators must successfully pivot to a more sustainable business model.
Table of contents
- No table of contents specified
Tables and charts
No table or charts specified
What's included
This report contains:
Other reports you may be interested in
Asset Report
Cenovus Energy Saskatchewan
Cenovus Energy was formed through a corporate reorganisation of Encana, in which two separate companies were created. The split was ...
$3,100
Asset Report
Seneca Resources - US West Coast
Seneca Resources explores for and produces oil and natural gas from the West Coast, Northeast, and Mid-Continent regions. In ...
$3,100
Asset Report
Pacific Northwest British Columbia
PETRONAS' core position in BC is the North Montney joint venture, located northwest of Farrell Creek. The JV consists of five ...
$3,100