Will Donald Trump's support for coal extend to carbon-capture?
*Please note that this report only includes an Excel data file if this is indicated in "What's included" below
Report summary
Table of contents
- A tale of two technologies
-
Costs and other considerations
-
Taking the next step beyond enhanced oil recovery
- Could grid reliability concerns support CCS?
- Cumulative coal retirements based on 70 year useful life
- Political activity to resurrect CCS
- Grid reliability alternatives
- Conclusion
-
Taking the next step beyond enhanced oil recovery
Tables and charts
This report includes the following images and tables:
-
Capital costs for coal CCS are higher than other "clean" alternatives2017 US power generation mix2036 US power generation mixWill Donald Trump's support for coal extend to carbon-capture?: Image 4
What's included
This report contains:
Other reports you may be interested in
Will US EPA’s proposed carbon emissions rule succeed where the Clean Power Plan failed?
Relying on carbon capture and hydrogen, the US EPA proposed carbon emission guidelines for the power sector.
$3,000Benchmarking Latin America energy markets
Latin America's major economies are progressing towards a lower-carbon and a more resilient energy future.
$1,250Trump’s impact on thermal coal markets after half a year in office
Trump's pro-coal policies show some marginal support. 5 mine expansions add 120+ Mst reserves.
$1,100