Better project delivery: upstream’s value opportunity
This report is currently unavailable
*Please note that this report only includes an Excel data file if this is indicated in "What's included" below
Report summary
Table of contents
- Executive summary
- How bad was it really?
- Spreading the pain around
- What went wrong in Australia?
- The financial cost of poor execution
- Turning the ship around
- A golden opportunity for stellar returns
- But can it last?
- The five ingredients for success
-
Appendix (1)
- Company case study: Eni
-
Appendix (2)
- For further details of Wood Mackenzie's Project Benchmarking capabilities please contact:
- Renaud Brimont Head of Consulting EMEARC renaud.brimont@woodmac.com
- or
- Piers Moffatt Principal, Upstream Consulting piers.moffatt@woodmac.com
Tables and charts
This report includes the following images and tables:
- Project delay (%) by type, 2006-2016 sanctions
- Capex range (%) by type, 2006-2016 sanctions
- IRR of projects by year of sanction at FID versus now (%), weighted average
- Range of project delays (%) by sanction date
- Capex range (%) by project sanction date
- How major projects got quicker: from FID to start-up and payback, by year of sanction
- Price impact on pre-FID and under dev. IRR
- IRR impact on pre-FID projects by varying capex
- LNG projects by year of sanction and location, with company targets for future sanctions (non-US)
What's included
This report contains:
Other reports you may be interested in
Vestprosess
The Vestprosess system includes the NGLs pipeline from the Kollsnes gas terminal and the Sture oil terminal to the Mongstad refinery.
$2,580US upstream in brief: Chevron and ExxonMobil quarterly Permian update
The US week in brief highlights the need-to-know current events from US upstream. Stories are supplemented with proprietary WoodMac views.
$1,350Q4 2017 North America LNG projects update: Total buys into Cameron LNG
We highlight the progress and any delays to proposed North American LNG projects.
$1,050