Find out how our Consulting team can help you and your organisation
The Strategic Repricing of Mining: Insights from the 2026 PDAC Convention
Key takeaways from meetings with Private and Institutional Investors, Operators, Developers and Government Representatives and Agencies
4 minute read
Nassam Estibill Zalaquett
Director, Metals & Mining, Americas
Nassam Estibill Zalaquett
Director, Metals & Mining, Americas
Nassam has extensive experience across the natural resources value chain.
Latest articles by Nassam
-
Opinion
The Strategic Repricing of Mining: Insights from the 2026 PDAC Convention
-
Opinion
Splitting at the source: trade-offs between lithium brine and hard rock extraction
-
Opinion
Optimism amidst despair: key takeaways from the 17th Lithium Supply and Battery Raw Materials Conference
-
Opinion
Copper: strategic insight amid policy risk and smelter margin pressures
-
Opinion
PDAC during turbulent times: navigating geopolitical shifts while placing bets on potentially resilient commodities
-
Opinion
Direct lithium extraction: is the hype justified by the reality?
PDAC 2026 reflected a meaningful shift in investor sentiment compared to a year ago. While the 2025 conference was dominated by geopolitical uncertainty — particularly the anticipated impact of US tariffs — this year's conversations centred on commodity fundamentals, capital discipline, and the structural role of metals in national security and energy transition. Despite the ongoing conflict in Iran weighing on broader geopolitical risk assessments, the prevailing tone was one of cautious optimism grounded in long-term demand visibility.
Copper: Supercycle or Superhype?
Copper remained the dominant commodity discussion at PDAC 2026. The primary debate centred on whether the flood of data centre announcements would and could translate into accelerated data centre construction and represent a genuine demand supercycle or an overhyped narrative. Wood Mackenzie's analysis presented to clients framed this as "superhyper" risk: data centre-driven demand is expected to contribute approximately 1.5–2 million tonnes of incremental copper demand over the next decade – significant, but modest relative to the ~10 million tonnes added during China's infrastrucutre boom of 2000s. Over 70% of projected data centre copper demand remains in the "proposed" stage rather than "committed," and in the PJM market a 3:1 imbalance between commited load (78 GW) and risk-adjusted accredited generation capacity (26 GW) underscores the gap between theoretical demand and physical grid reality. Supply response, while suffering disruption in different assets globally during 2025, has not materially faltered.
That said, the structural case for copper remains strong. Growing electrification demand beyond data centres — EVs, grid infrastructure, renewable energy — continues to underpin a positive demand story, while declining ore grades and lengthy permitting timelines weigh on future supply. Yet supply does respond: already in 2026, nearly 800 ktpa of additional capacity has been sanctioned, with further upside from mega-projects in standby such as Cobre Panamá and Reko Diq. Wood Mackenzie estimates that ~880 ktpa of new capacity must be sanctioned annually for the next decade to meet primary demand. With prices at elevated levels and 1.2 Mtpa of projects approaching FID, we raise the question: is this fundamentally a resource scarcity problem, or a willingness-to-pay question?
Valuation Pressures and Shifting Investment Strategies
A major theme amongst institutional investors, private equity, and mining-focused banks was the challenge of deploying capital at reasonable valuations. Transaction multiples across advanced-stage copper and gold assets have reached historically elevated levels, driven by an influx of non-traditional investors — including sovereign wealth funds, technology sector strategists, and generalist private equity — willing to pay premiums above what disciplined mining investors might consider fundamental value.
In response, experienced participants are adapting in three key ways:
- Shift to debt: Many traditional equity investors are rotating into royalty streams, streaming deals, and project-level debt to avoid overpaying for equity.
- Gold company diversification: With gold prices at elevated levels (above US$5,000/oz in early 2026), gold producers are generating exceptional free cash flow. Several are actively using surplus capital to acquire copper exposure and divest Tier 2 gold assets, whilst maintaining strong dividend programmes. This select commodity diversification has further driven copper asset valuations, as well-capitalised gold companies compete aggressively for acquisitions with robust balance sheets. Wood Mackenzie expects gold to average between US$4,000 to US$5,000/oz in 2026, with a long-term assumption of US$3,400/oz sustaining strong sector margins.
- Early-stage repositioning: Unable to compete on advanced-stage valuations, investors are moving earlier in the project lifecycle — targeting advanced exploration and pre-feasibility stage assets. This is reflected in the notable re-rating of junior mining equities over the past 12 months, with the GDXJ index up ~183% in 2025 and the junior miner index outperforming broader mining benchmarks.
Capital Returns on Mining — With Discipline
Following the capital destruction of the previous supercycle, the top eight diversified miners peaked at ~US$76 billion in annual capital allocation around 2012 whilst paying only ~US$20 billion in dividends — the sector has spent the last decade rebuilding financial credibility. CapEx bottomed in 2017, and the industry subsequently shifted towards shareholder returns.
Today, a more balanced posture is emerging. CapEx is rising again, primarily directed at strategic commodities, whilst dividends have remained relatively stable since peaking around 2020. This reflects a structurally healthier capital allocation framework — investing for future supply whilst protecting shareholder returns — rather than the volume growth focus that defined the 2008–2012 era. A critical tension persists, however: ex-China supply growth is increasingly a capital allocation choice rather than a geology constraint, as Western miners optimise for return on capital over volume growth, whilst China continues to deploy capital counter-cyclically across the value chain.
Building an Ex-China Supply Chain: Progress, Cost, and Realism
A defining macro theme at PDAC 2026 was the accelerating effort by Western governments to build supply chains independent of Chinese processing dominance. Since 2015, China has invested an estimated US$176 billion in global metals and mining and has been the dominant capital provider into midstream metals processing, whilst US and allied investment remained largely passive. That is changing rapidly.
Over the past two years, an estimated US$50 billion in U.S. government, allied, and private capital has been committed or targeted for investment in critical minerals value chains through initiatives including: the "One Big Beautiful Bill" Act (signed July 2025), Project Vault (a US$10 billion EXIM Bank-backed strategic critical minerals reserve), the US-Australia Critical Minerals Framework, the Canada Critical Minerals Sovereign Fund (C$2 billion), and private vehicles such as the Appian-IFC Minerals Fund and JPMorgan's Security and Resilience Fund.
The critical caveat: ex-China supply chains are inherently more expensive and will take longer to scale given project lead times of 8–15 years for large mines. Participants broadly acknowledged that this is a strategic premium worth paying — but only if investment is sustained and not subject to political volatility.
Argentina: From No to Maybe
Argentina's investment climate showed measurable improvement at PDAC 2026. At last year's conference, most private bank representatives expressed interest but reluctance to deploy capital in the country. This year, the tone shifted towards cautious openness, driven by the continued presence of major mining companies — including BHP, Rio Tinto, FQM and Lundin — validating the jurisdiction. Key projects advancing in the country include the Tier 1 Vicuña integrated copper-gold district (~400 ktpa Cu, 700 koz Au over 25 years) and Taca Taca (~291 kt Cu first decade average), both benefiting from Argentina's RIGI regime which grants investments over US$2 billion a series of benefits, most importantly 30 years of stable fiscal terms. Private bank appetite remains conditional on participation from export credit agencies (ECAs) and other senior lenders to de-risk project financing. The direction of travel is still cautious but clearly more positive.
Beyond Copper: Gold, Lithium, and Broader Commodity Interest
Copper dominated, but three additional commodity narratives emerged prominently:
- Gold: Strong investor interest in price trajectory, with spot prices near multi-year highs. Gold demand has shifted structurally, with investment and central bank purchases now driving incremental demand over jewellery — global ETF flows surged from ~US$4 billion in 2024 to US$89 billion in 2025 (World Gold Council). Producers are optimistic with strong cash flow, repositioning portfolios, and returning capital.
- Lithium: Despite a difficult 2023–2024 price cycle, interest in the lithium value chain remained meaningful. Over 95% of demand is driven by energy transition sectors via EVs and energy storage. Investors are taking a longer-term view on EV adoption and battery storage demand, with Wood Mackenzie anticipating battery-grade carbonate prices recovering towards US$21/kg.
- Steel: Discussed in the context of data centre, construction, broader infrastructure build-out, green premium materialisation, and continued strategic national interest in the industry. With particular interest in DR-grade pellet feed for EAF decarbonisation. The combined steel market is forecast to reach US$2.6 trillion by 2050 versus US$1 trillion for key energy transition commodities, though with less urgency than copper or battery metals.
Conclusion
PDAC 2026 confirmed a sector in transition: better capitalised, more strategically motivated, and increasingly viewed as a critical geopolitical imperative rather than a pure commodity play. The convergence of energy transition, national security, and AI-driven power demand is creating a durable demand narrative across multiple metals. The challenge for investors and operators is not conviction — it is finding attractive assets in an increasingly crowded market at prices that reflect true fundamentals rather than strategic premiums.
For those navigating this complex landscape, the imperative is clear: understand where capital is flowing, recognise the structural shifts reshaping valuations, and identify opportunities where disciplined investment principles can still deliver compelling returns.
Embrace the opportunities
This insight was brought to you by our Metals and Mining Consulting team. Fill out the form at the top of the page to get in touch with the team today and learn how we can help you navigate these critical challenges to make smarter decisions with confidence.
Plus, discover Lens Metals & Mining; our all-in-one platform that lets you unearth robust data analytics from mine to market. With over 3,330 assets encompassing mines, smelters, refineries and new projects across key mined commodities, Lens Metals & Mining allows investors and financiers like you to identify, evaluate and screen for growth opportunities. Find out more about Lens Metals & Mining.