Should the Majors spin off new energy?
This report is currently unavailable
*Please note that this report only includes an Excel data file if this is indicated in "What's included" below
Report summary
Table of contents
- Utilities have been here before
- 1) Lowering the cost of capital: sum of the parts vs sum of the aparts
- 2) Improved see-through value
- 3) Enhanced capacity for corporate renewables M&A
- 4) More efficient capital allocation
- What are the trade-offs?
- Leveraging operational synergies
- Funding potential of legacy cash flow
- Exploiting synergies with the legacy business
Tables and charts
This report includes the following images and tables:
-
Examples of the evolution of equity holdings in renewables subsidiariesExamples of the evolution of equity holdings in oil and gas subsidiariesMajors’ net renewable capacity targets
-
EV/trailing 12-month EBITDA: Big Renewables vs the Majors (at 31/12/2020)Enterprise value of Repsol’s LCG business under different EV/EBITDA multiple scenarios ( M)WM estimate of BP’s wind and solar cash flow if targets are hit: baseline returns vs integration uplift
What's included
This report contains:
Other reports you may be interested in
Caofeidian, MCC Ramu - Nickel sulphate refinery
A detailed analysis of MCC Ramu New Energy’s Caofeidian nickel sulphate refinery.
$2,250Jiangmen, Fangyuan - Nickel sulphate refinery
A detailed analysis of the Jiangmen nickel sulphate refinery.
$2,250Yifeng - Lithium refinery
A detailed analysis of the Yifeng lithium refinery.
$2,250