Discuss your challenges with our solutions experts

For details on how your data is used and stored, see our Privacy Notice.

How green is the road ahead for polyester?

1 minute read

While the technology exists to produce the precursors to polyester from biomass sources, potentially replacing fossil fuels, is this an environmentally sound concept with minimal ecological impact?


Polyester is everywhere, from the plastic packaging in which we wrap our food, to the bottles which hold our drinks, to the shirts on our backs. Creating, tempering, extruding and finishing the polymer is a global growth industry. Polyester’s versatility and scalability means we expect demand growth to continue at 4-5% for the next five years, driven primarily by Asian fibre markets.

As demand continues to grow and the polymer gains market share, producers and consumers are asking: can polyester production be sustainable?

This is a more complex question than it may appear to be, owing to multiple challenges, at each stage of the production chain.

Exploring the sustainability opportunities

Identify and exploit technologies to build sustainability into the polyester value chain

Stepping towards sustainability

Based on analysis supported by the University of Cambridge, we believe that the answer lies in a phased approach. In the short term, recycling technology is proven and offers achievable environmental benefits. Long term, biomass promises potential advantages, but questions remain as to whether today’s technology is scalable and robust.

When Tesoro acquired Virent, a leading developer of biomass technology for the production of paraxylene, it was a clear signal that leading companies are starting to consider biomass as a strategic solution. Yet many unanswered questions remain. For example, there are concerns around allocating arable land to chemical production as opposed to food crops, and the environmental trade-offs between biomass crops from the use of fertilisers. And recent low crude prices have benefited the economics of conventionally sourced virgin polymer, pushing sustainability further down the agenda.

So where does sustainability fit within today’s polyester industry?

The PTA example

Terephthalic acid (PTA) is a major raw ingredient of polyester. Over the past two decades, PTA production has reduced its carbon footprint by some 40%.

Assessing the energy recovery improvements over the past two decades

Understand the changing energy usage picture

Yet, efficiency gains are finite. PTA technology has improved, approaching the thermodynamic limit of performance.

Moreover, in addition to the PTA plants using newer technologies, assets built over 20 years ago are still operating today. This highlights the main problem with the typical industry-wide environmental studies: the data is aggregated and averaged across a wide range of facilities. This obscures the disparity in process yields, fuel sourcing, and energy efficiency between individual assets.

My analysis, the Environmental Impact Curve (EIC), aims to develop specific understanding on an asset-by-asset basis, supported by our supply/demand database and cost modelling. Think of the EIC like a cost curve, but instead of quantifying the cost, we look at an environmental impact. The EIC chart below shows the cradle-to-gate carbon footprint for the global PTA industry. The area under the curve represents the potential for improvement. The analysis is powerful because, for the first time, the worst offending assets are shown in context of the best producers.

Cradle to gate overview of sustainable polyester

Understanding the scope of the opportunity

This means producers can differentiate their business not only on the basis of cost, but also at an environmental level. From PTA consumers, this means they can establish genuinely sustainable supply chain sourcing strategies, selecting suppliers who can deliver low carbon polyester products. In launching PTAir, BP is leading this approach. It will be interesting to see how swiftly others will follow suit.

Related content