Insight
Paying for performance: Examining well cost versus productivity
This report is currently unavailable
*Please note that this report only includes an Excel data file if this is indicated in "What's included" below
Report summary
Operators must constantly balance between cost and production performance when planning wells within a portfolio. Longer larerals, more fracture stages, increased water and proppant usage are all factors that have been show to enhance production, but also markedly increase well cost. This analysis takes a look at capital efficiency using recent well completions in the Eagle Ford.
Table of contents
- Background: Estimating well costs
- Will spending more get you more?
- Value over volume
- Why is EOG so special?
- Conclusion
Tables and charts
This report includes the following images and tables:
-
Figure 1. Major cost componentsFigure 2. Bakken well cost estimate heat mapKarnes Trough and Edwards Condensate sub-plays of the Eagle Ford
-
Well cost - Eagle Ford study area 2014-2015Implied EUR and IP by operatorWell cost distribution (NAWAT)Capital efficiency - IPCapital efficiency - EUREOG leads the pack in capital efficiency over the initial six months...and in oil production per lateral foot
What's included
This report contains:
Other reports you may be interested in
Asset Report
Loma Campana Area
Loma Campana is the flagship development of Argentina's Vaca Muerta shale. In July 2013, Chevron joined YPF to develop the area and ...
$3,720
Asset Report
Marcellus Key Play
Detailed play intelligence including analysis on activity, costs, subsurface and operator performance.
$22,800
Asset Report
Global exploration trends 2025
Analysis of high-level trends in global conventional exploration over 2015-2024, including spend, volumes discovered and value creation.
$11,000
