Insight

Petroleum fiscal systems: 2016 in review

Loading current market price

Get this report

Loading current market price

Get this report as part of a subscription

Enquire about subscriptions

Already have subscription? Sign In

Further information

Contact us

Submit your details to receive further information about this report.

  • An error has occurred while getting captcha image
For details on how your data is used and stored, see our Privacy Notice.
 

Report summary

2016 kept pace with 2015, registering 41 changes to oil and gas fiscal terms. The last two years have been fiscally unstable as governments tried to deal with the fail in oil price. Mexico made the most revisions, but tax changes in other producing countries had a bigger impact on investor value. Budget concerns forced tax increases. Russia and Brazil hit the headlines, while HB247 in Alaska ignited much debate. Elsewhere, there was a renewed drive to minimise the impact of costs because tax collections collapsed. India’s move was one of the most extreme. Some concessions were made to help producers break even, as many fields were running at a loss in early 2016. The tax cut in the UK was one of the largest, but the move was more about preserving jobs and spurring investment in undeveloped fields. More countries adopted progressive taxation, primarily to provide downside protection. But the reason for change in Ecuador was subtly different to Kazakhstan or Alberta.

What's included

This report contains

  • Document

    Petroleum Fiscal Systems 2016 in review (wallchart).pdf

    PDF 33.74 KB

  • Document

    Fiscal Service Overview.pdf

    PDF 1002.46 KB

  • Document

    Petroleum fiscal systems: 2016 in review

    PDF 401.65 KB

  • Document

    Petroleum fiscal systems: 2016 in review

    ZIP 1.15 MB

Table of contents

    • 1. Mexico was the most active country in a busy year
    • 2. Budget concerns forced tax increases
    • 3. Renewed drive to minimise the impact of costs
    • 4. Tight margins and the scrap for FIDs delivered tax cuts
    • 5. More countries adopted progressive taxation
    • 6. Corporate tax changes had little effect
        • January
        • February
        • March
        • April
        • May
        • July
        • August
        • September
        • October
        • November
        • December

Tables and charts

This report includes 1 images and tables including:

Tables

  • Petroleum fiscal systems: 2016 in review: Table 1

Questions about this report?

    • Europe:
      +44 131 243 4699
    • Americas:
      +1 713 470 1900
    • Asia Pacific:
      +61 2 8224 8898