Suncor faces a Millennium-sized dilemma
*Please note that this report only includes an Excel data file if this is indicated in "What's included" below
Report summary
Table of contents
- Executive summary
-
Millennium Mine Extension project background
- The extension faces a unique regulatory quagmire
- The project decision will inevitably be a political one
- Scenario 1: Millennium Mine Extension proceeds
-
Scenario 2: organic in situ projects built to replace the mined bitumen
- No single operator has brought on this much in situ growth simultaneously
- Contrasting brownfield mine and greenfield in situ economics
-
Wildcards: M&A provides more options
- Sunrise, CNOOC and MEG have different cons and none are enough on their own
- Mixing acquisitions and newbuild investment has risk-mitigating appeal
- The net zero / emissions overlay
Tables and charts
This report includes the following images and tables:
-
Scenario1: Suncor bitumen productionScenario 1: Suncor capital spend profileScenario 2: Suncor bitumen production
-
Scenario 2: Suncor capital spend profileEconomic outputsCumulative cash flows under Base priceTimeline of eventsAppendix: Map of Suncor Base Mine and vicinity leases and projects
What's included
This report contains:
Other reports you may be interested in
Suncor SAGD Project (Firebag)
Suncor holds a number of leases near its mining operation that are being developed using Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD), known ...
$3,720Sunrise
The Sunrise project (formerly part of the Kearl project) is located in the Athabasca oil sands region of Canada, 60 kilometres ...
$3,720Redesigning reliability amidst Texas-sized growth: ERCOT 2025 H2 market report
Comprehensive analysis of the ERCOT power market
$8,000