Editorial

Are deepwater economics on par with US tight oil?

Deepwater projects are getting smaller but cheaper to develop

Angus Rodger, Research Director, Asia Pacific

Angus Rodger

Research Director, Asia Pacific

Angus leads our benchmark analysis of global Pre-FID delays, and deep water developments.

Latest articles by Angus

View Angus Rodger's full profile

How can we help?

Contact us

How can we help?

With all the attention surrounding US tight oil breakevens and the Permian boom, the past few years seem to have left deepwater investment in the dust. But as it has gotten leaner, the deepwater industry is quietly recovering and improving its own economics.

While US tight oil faces a minimum of 10 to 20% rapid cost inflation as oil companies drill in earnest and service sector demand booms, deepwater projects continue to move down the cost curve.

Drivers include re-worked  project designs, fewer and cheaper wells, smaller facilities, and portfolio high-grading. By focusing on smaller but smarter developments, deepwater project breakevens are over 20% lower than mid-2014, with 5 billion barrels of oil equivalent (boe) breaking even at US$50/boe and 15 billion at US$60/boe (NPV15).

After nearly three years of struggling to attract new investment, we are beginning to see evidence that the playing field is beginning to level for two of the most important upstream asset classes — tight oil and deepwater.

 

How did deepwater project economics become competitive with US tight oil?

Upstream Research Director Angus Rodger explains how we've arrived at these project economics.

We believe deepwater can provide viable competition with tight oil for investment within the portfolios of the industry's major players. 'Permania' broke out of the gate early, and has a strong lead, but deepwater is the dark horse.

Given we remain in a capital-constrained world and many players have exited the deepwater sector to focus on the onshore US, the outlook for new FIDs remains challenging. But we believe more deepwater projects will achieve sub-US$50/boe breakevens, as evidenced already in the Gulf of Mexico. The first quarter of 2017 saw three projects sanctioned — two in the Gulf of Mexico, one offshore Israel — and all have breakevens below US$50/boe. We see around eight projects making FID in 2017 — a number which equals 2016 and 2015 combined.

The days of rock-bottom tight oil breakevens are probably behind us. The Gulf of Mexico is in a strong position in the near and long term because they have a level playing field for services, and it's ultra-competitive.

Angus Rodger, Research Director, Asia Pacific

Angus Rodger

Research Director, Asia Pacific

Angus leads our benchmark analysis of global Pre-FID delays, and deep water developments.

Latest articles by Angus

View Angus Rodger's full profile

Deepwater will continue to be the primary source for world-class conventional discoveries — of our top 15 wildcat 'wells to watch' in 2017, almost all are in more than 400 metres of water. If the Majors want to grow, they need to sanction projects. So what's next? Only the most competitive deepwater projects will move forward, but those that thrive may give investors pause, even in an industry rapt by unconventional noise.

This analysis was prepared using our Global Economic Model (GEM), available upon subscription.

Read about deepwater economics in the news