Sustainable smelting: how green can it go?
4 minute read
Traditional metal production is inherently polluting – according to data from our Emissions Benchmarking Tool, it’s currently responsible for 9% of global greenhouse gas emissions. So, with pressure mounting on the sector to go green (or at least as green as possible), what initiatives are being proposed to reduce the carbon footprint of smelting?
In our recent webinar Sustainable smelting – driving a new industry dynamic, we explored how the sector is rising to the challenge. Got 45 minutes? Fill in the form to access a complimentary replay of the webinar, along with the presentation slides. Got five minutes? Read on for an introduction to some of the key themes.
Renewables: greening the power source of energy-intensive smelting
Many of the metals produced in smelting operations around the world will play a vital role in the energy transition. For example, nickel and cobalt are used in electric vehicle (EV) batteries, while metals like copper and aluminum are increasingly used in decarbonising power generation. Given these end uses, there is a growing desire to produce metals with little-to-no carbon footprint.
Smelting is highly energy-intensive. Traditionally, the power for smelting has come from either grids using both renewable and non-renewable sources or via onsite generation from hydrocarbons or coal. Sustainable smelting will therefore require greening the energy supply to smelting plants through a 100% renewable grid, clean onsite generation or buying into offsite renewables.
Smelters are already making commitments to power their operations either partly or wholly through dedicated solar and wind power from partners and third-party companies in the next few years.
Carbon capture: the only way to get to net zero smelting?
While using renewable energy can remove carbon emissions from the power used in smelting, it cannot decarbonise the process completely. When metal ore is decomposed using a source of carbon such as coke or coal as a reductant, CO2 is inevitably created as a by-product.
One solution is carbon capture. Captured CO2 can be stored in depleted oil and gas fields, or deep saline aquifers. It can also potentially be injected in liquefied form into suitable rock formations, or sequestered into concrete. Another technique is to re-inject the CO2 from furnaces as part of a synthetic gas for use as part of the process chemistry.
These approaches are still in their infancy, but we expect significant progress in the future.
Black mass recycling: a greener alternative to smelting?
One alternative to producing new metal from ore is to extract and reuse the raw materials from old lithium-ion batteries. When batteries reach the end of their lives, they are collected, dismantled and shredded. The shredded material is then processed to produce a powdery substance known as black mass.
The exact composition of black mass depends on the particular feedstock, recyclers and recycling process involved, but it will largely comprise various battery metals including lithium, cobalt, nickel and manganese. These can then be separated out through further processing and returned to the battery supply chain.
However, making black mass recycling scalable and cost-effective will require significant investment, as well as the establishment of standardised material specifications between producers and customers. The battery raw materials sector has seen numerous examples of producers being unable to consistently achieve refined battery quality material specifications, such as in the case of lithium. The black mass recycling sector will likely face this same hurdle as new technologies become developed and proven in the sector. Therefore, a crucial aspect of standardisation will be not only the establishment of product quality specifications, but the consistent ability of producers to achieve them.
China: a case study in more sustainable smelting
China has pledged to reduce carbon intensity by 60-65% compared to 2005 figures by 2030, and be carbon neutral by 2060. To achieve these goals, policies and plans were announced in late 2021 with a strong focus on the energy consumption and emissions of energy-intensive industries, including metal smelting.
Chinese producers are already starting to relocate their smelters away from city centres. As well as providing better access to clean energy sources and raw materials, relocation can also enable the combined treatment of residues from the smelting of different metals on one site. At the same time, new technology can be introduced to reduce residues and abate emissions, while older, more polluting processes can be abandoned. In addition, the industry will continue to see more M&A cross capacity scales, different technologies and even different metals as industries rationalise, resulting in just a few large groups or industrial clusters controlling metal production.
From a raw materials perspective, new governance standards will mean a preference for cleaner concentrate with lower levels of toxic heavy metals including arsenic, cadmium and mercury. Policies also target improving the recycling ratio of strategic metal resources and promoting the development of circular economy.
Green hydrogen: huge potential for smelting operations
One technology which has enormous potential in metallurgical operations is so-called ‘green’ hydrogen, that is, hydrogen produced from water by renewables-powered electrolysis in an essentially clean process.
Hydrogen can essentially replace the use of carbon in smelting, preventing CO2 being emitted at all. However, there are a lot of obstacles to overcome before this becomes a viable large-scale option.
Want to know more? Fill in the form at the top of the page for complimentary access to the Sustainable smelting: driving a new industry dynamic webinar replay and slides. This includes detailed analysis of the use case for green hydrogen, along with more in-depth coverage of the other factors discussed here.